There are some parties who fought the election on strong Anti-Congress campaigning in election. If they join Congress Party or UPA directly or support from outside should be treated as cheater and a case of forgery with voters may be lodged against such individuals or the group or the party.
TDP won seat protesting rule of Congress party in AP
Left won seat protesting rule of Congress party in WB
Chiranjivi’s Party PJP won seat protesting rule of Congress party in AP
BJD of Orissa won seat protesting rule of Congress party in Orissa
National Conference
RJD ridiculed Congress Party, JD(U) and BJP in Bihar
LSP of Paswan ridiculed Congress Party, JD(U) and BJP in Bihar
SP of Mulayam ridiculed Congress Party, BJP and BSP in UP
BSP of UP blamed Congress Party , SP and BJP
Following parties who are at daggers drawn to each other and hence these group can not remain together in one group, UPA, or NDA or Third front. If they decide to remain together just to capture power, they should be treated as the greatest cheater and traitor on the earth. It means further that they are white colored terrorist and money mafia and the most ambitious , greedy, moralless,shameless, faceless, leader who can even stab the nation for their self interest. They are the true enemy of voters. Such leaders and individuals must by punished severely by voters or by President of India or any competent authority. Any individual MP from any such group has got no moral right to switch over to his rival party just to gain participation in government.
SP and BSP in UP
DMK and AIADMK in Tamilnadu
TMC of Mamta and Left Front in West Bengal
RJD and JD(U) in Bihar
There are some state mentioned below where thee was main fight between Congress Party and BJP. If any individual MP of either BJP or Congress Party switch over their loyalty from one camp to other it must be treated fraud with voters and hence a case of forgery must be lodged. At least President of India should not allow such thing to happen.
Rajathan
Madhya Pradesh
Chhatishgarh
Gujarat
Delhi
Karnataka
People are astonished to hear the news of BJP and Congress Party sharing power in Parliament.
It is difficult to happen. But the situation will compel both to share power to avoid frequent election and to keep smaller parties away from national politics whose agenda is to blackmail with national parties and grab maximum amount of cake. It is result of 20 years experience of coalition government that BJP and Congress have realized or should realize that whenever they formed government jointly with smaller parties or regional parties , smaller became bigger and bigger became smaller.
As a matter of fact President of India is deaf and dumb and also blind and indifferent to what is happening in the country. She has been enjoying the glamour, comfort of Rashtrapati Bhawan. She has been acting as true Rubber Stamp of the government. She could not persuade, compel or direct small regional parties to align themselves with any one of national parties whose present is at least in 10 states and which has the record of gaining at least 20% of votes polled in the election held in the past.
Every person in the country know and understand well that none of the political party or group is going to win simple majority in the election held this year. There is 24 hours debate going on TV and it is open secret for last two- three months that the result of the election will be fracture mandate. Experts of media are trying their best to portray the national scene on TV, of course with biased attitude.
But perhaps President of India is not interested to take care of the critical situation likely to emerge after the result. In our country there is a tradition that police reaches spot when looters complete the task of looting and fly away from the town inspite of complaint call received from several quarters. Similarly fire brigade mostly reaches the spot when every thing is burnt or common mass has already extinguished the fire with available water. Our President is therefore waiting for crisis to take place in the country, allowing winning candidates to be traded openly by various political parties through the channel of top trade houses. She will like to be silent spectator of political drama, open rape of democracy and cheating with voters taking place in the country. She will act only when her mentor Congress Party leaders advises her to do or act.
There is no innovative idea, no creativeness and no urge for initiative in the mind of President to cure or to diagnose the sick mind of dirty politicians. It is very much painful. There s no need of having one piece of such President in the country. Two decades ago when elected representatives used to switch over from one party to other frequently, anti defection act was enacted to prevent fraud with voters. Now openly leaders are abusing rival candidate during election and after election shamelessly hug each other, clear cut case of cheating with voters and is worst kind of defection one can ever visualize.
Danendra Jain Agartala
15h May 2009
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Modi Nitish Pawar Who is fittest for PM
One person asked me question: “who is a better candidate for the post of PM – Modi, Nitish or Sharad Pawar”
As long as L K Advani is alive, Modi cannot be PM and BJP does not like breach of discipline. Even Modi does not like to be PM superseding L Advani. It is media’s creation or you can say effort of the congress party and so-called secular parties to divide BJP and NDA. Luckily all failed to create difference between Advani and Modi.
Same is the position with Nitish Kumar. People in Meida who play role for Congress party are spreading such news in the market so that controversy arises in NDA. We have seen drama in UPA and the conflicting role played by UPA partners during election which ended just yesterday. Shamelessly the erstwhile partners will again come together to snatch and capture power from the hands of NDA who will be able to form government more comfortably than UPA.
Again fortunately Nitish Kumar is an experienced, matured and shrewd politician. He understands well the pulse of general mass and he does not want to create unnecessary debate on this issue and this is why he has openly admitted L K Advani as the fittest candidate for the post of PM. Nitish cannot be swayed by imaginary offers made by media and by the people belonging to UPA or the third front.
There is no question of Sharad Pawar whose recognition is confined in Maharashtra state only and who remained failure even as BCCI president. If NCP fights alone I think his party will not be able to win even double digit seats in Parliamentary election. His party could not give a stable government in state like Meghalaya. His old friend Mr. Sangma is also trying to switch over to NDA camp. Here also it is the creation of media people who are trying to create differences between UPA partners. Old whimsical person Mr. Bal Thakre is also unnecessarily boosting up Pawar’s name to please Marathi voters. Person who has not gone above state politics or caste politics or regional politics cannot be given the responsibility of the country without risk of sabotaging federal structure of the country.
As such all the three are not fit for PM as of now.
So far imagination is concerned I also can become and prove to be better PM than many others who are in queue. I am not a good speaker like modern day politicians but I have the capacity to perform better than many MPs of the Parliament.
In my opinion therefore question of selecting PM’s name among Nitish, Modi and Pawar is irrelevant in the current situation.
Danendra Jain
14th May 2009
As long as L K Advani is alive, Modi cannot be PM and BJP does not like breach of discipline. Even Modi does not like to be PM superseding L Advani. It is media’s creation or you can say effort of the congress party and so-called secular parties to divide BJP and NDA. Luckily all failed to create difference between Advani and Modi.
Same is the position with Nitish Kumar. People in Meida who play role for Congress party are spreading such news in the market so that controversy arises in NDA. We have seen drama in UPA and the conflicting role played by UPA partners during election which ended just yesterday. Shamelessly the erstwhile partners will again come together to snatch and capture power from the hands of NDA who will be able to form government more comfortably than UPA.
Again fortunately Nitish Kumar is an experienced, matured and shrewd politician. He understands well the pulse of general mass and he does not want to create unnecessary debate on this issue and this is why he has openly admitted L K Advani as the fittest candidate for the post of PM. Nitish cannot be swayed by imaginary offers made by media and by the people belonging to UPA or the third front.
There is no question of Sharad Pawar whose recognition is confined in Maharashtra state only and who remained failure even as BCCI president. If NCP fights alone I think his party will not be able to win even double digit seats in Parliamentary election. His party could not give a stable government in state like Meghalaya. His old friend Mr. Sangma is also trying to switch over to NDA camp. Here also it is the creation of media people who are trying to create differences between UPA partners. Old whimsical person Mr. Bal Thakre is also unnecessarily boosting up Pawar’s name to please Marathi voters. Person who has not gone above state politics or caste politics or regional politics cannot be given the responsibility of the country without risk of sabotaging federal structure of the country.
As such all the three are not fit for PM as of now.
So far imagination is concerned I also can become and prove to be better PM than many others who are in queue. I am not a good speaker like modern day politicians but I have the capacity to perform better than many MPs of the Parliament.
In my opinion therefore question of selecting PM’s name among Nitish, Modi and Pawar is irrelevant in the current situation.
Danendra Jain
14th May 2009
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Blackmail or coalition
National party for national election and one common election for all purposes will save lot of money and time, both for the government and the individual or political party participating in the election process.
There must be two or three political parties in the election fray and the constitution should have such provision which can restrict regional parties to confine them at regional level only.
One suggestion in my opinion is to declare those parties which have consistently secured more than 15 to 20 % of votes polled or more than 10 % of total votes as national parties and only such parties will be eligible for participating in the election for the Parliament. Secondly, Political parties which have network in at least 10 out of 20 big states should only be treated as fit for contesting Parliament election.
Individuals who secure less than 10% of votes must be fined with at least ten lac rupees and political parties which secure less than 20% of votes should be fined with the same amount.
If regional parties are inclined to participate in such election they will have to declare before election that they will fight under the banner of which national party.
Another way to make the election effective and fruitful is to avoid direct election system for Parliament. because each state have different priorities and preferences .As such election should be conducted only for state assemblies and out of every five MLAs, one should be nominated as MP for Parliament either directly by concerned political parties or election commissioner based on certain predefined logics and principles.
National parties, say BJP has 100 MLA’s in the state of MP; they will declare 20 as MP who will participate in Parliament proceedings. Similarly a group of five MLAs will decide the name of one member will go for Parliament.
Alternately government may declare one constituency as representative for Parliament.
Whatever may be the consensus in this regard , I am of the strong opinion that number of political parties participating in the election for Lok Sabha should be bare minimum and there should not be frequent election, one for assemblies, another for Parliament and third for Panchayat or Municipality.
One combined election should be made enough and member for different organs at different levels should be elected through one and only one process of election in five years. This will not only save huge expenses of political parties and the government but also help in mitigating the pain of coalition politics and avoid incident of mutual mudslinging and leg pulling between state government and central government. Besides voters will find it easy to decide as to who is responsible for non performance and lack of development in their area.
Danendra Jain, Ganaraj Choumuhani Agartala
6th May 2009
There must be two or three political parties in the election fray and the constitution should have such provision which can restrict regional parties to confine them at regional level only.
One suggestion in my opinion is to declare those parties which have consistently secured more than 15 to 20 % of votes polled or more than 10 % of total votes as national parties and only such parties will be eligible for participating in the election for the Parliament. Secondly, Political parties which have network in at least 10 out of 20 big states should only be treated as fit for contesting Parliament election.
Individuals who secure less than 10% of votes must be fined with at least ten lac rupees and political parties which secure less than 20% of votes should be fined with the same amount.
If regional parties are inclined to participate in such election they will have to declare before election that they will fight under the banner of which national party.
Another way to make the election effective and fruitful is to avoid direct election system for Parliament. because each state have different priorities and preferences .As such election should be conducted only for state assemblies and out of every five MLAs, one should be nominated as MP for Parliament either directly by concerned political parties or election commissioner based on certain predefined logics and principles.
National parties, say BJP has 100 MLA’s in the state of MP; they will declare 20 as MP who will participate in Parliament proceedings. Similarly a group of five MLAs will decide the name of one member will go for Parliament.
Alternately government may declare one constituency as representative for Parliament.
Whatever may be the consensus in this regard , I am of the strong opinion that number of political parties participating in the election for Lok Sabha should be bare minimum and there should not be frequent election, one for assemblies, another for Parliament and third for Panchayat or Municipality.
One combined election should be made enough and member for different organs at different levels should be elected through one and only one process of election in five years. This will not only save huge expenses of political parties and the government but also help in mitigating the pain of coalition politics and avoid incident of mutual mudslinging and leg pulling between state government and central government. Besides voters will find it easy to decide as to who is responsible for non performance and lack of development in their area.
Danendra Jain, Ganaraj Choumuhani Agartala
6th May 2009
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)